Quality of life comparison
If you lived in Western Sahara instead of Wallis and Futuna, you would:
live 15.7 years less
In Wallis and Futuna, the average life expectancy is 80 years (77 years for men, 83 years for women) as of 2020. In Western Sahara, that number is 64 years (62 years for men, 67 years for women) as of 2020.
make 34.2% less money
Wallis and Futuna has a GDP per capita of $3,800 as of 2004, while in Western Sahara, the GDP per capita is $2,500 as of 2007.
have 2.2 times more children
In Wallis and Futuna, there are approximately 12.7 babies per 1,000 people as of 2020. In Western Sahara, there are 28.0 babies per 1,000 people as of 2020.
be 11.4 times more likely to die during infancy
In Wallis and Futuna, approximately 4.2 children die before they reach the age of one as of 2020. In Western Sahara, on the other hand, 47.9 children do as of 2020.
see 8.6 times more coastline
Wallis and Futuna has a total of 129 km of coastline. In Western Sahara, that number is 1,110 km.
The statistics above were calculated using the following data sources: The World Factbook.
Western Sahara: At a glance
How big is Western Sahara compared to Wallis and Futuna? See an in-depth size comparison.