Quality of life comparison

compared to

If you lived in Finland instead of Burma, you would:

Health

live 11.8 years longer

In Burma, the average life expectancy is 70 years (68 years for men, 72 years for women) as of 2022. In Finland, that number is 82 years (79 years for men, 85 years for women) as of 2022.

be 3.8 times more likely to be obese

In Burma, 5.8% of adults are obese as of 2016. In Finland, that number is 22.2% of people as of 2016.

Economy

make 10.5 times more money

Burma has a GDP per capita of $4,500 as of 2020, while in Finland, the GDP per capita is $47,300 as of 2020.

be 50.8% less likely to live below the poverty line

In Burma, 24.8% live below the poverty line as of 2017. In Finland, however, that number is 12.2% as of 2019.

be 65.8% more likely to be unemployed

In Burma, 4.0% of adults are unemployed as of 2017. In Finland, that number is 6.6% as of 2019.

Life

be 98.8% less likely to die during childbirth

In Burma, approximately 250.0 women per 100,000 births die during labor as of 2017. In Finland, 3.0 women do as of 2017.

be 93.5% less likely to die during infancy

In Burma, approximately 32.9 children (per 1,000 live births) die before they reach the age of one as of 2022. In Finland, on the other hand, 2.1 children do as of 2022.

have 36.2% fewer children

In Burma, there are approximately 16.3 babies per 1,000 people as of 2022. In Finland, there are 10.4 babies per 1,000 people as of 2022.

Basic Needs

be 96.1% more likely to have access to electricity

In Burma, approximately 51% of the population has electricity access as of 2019. In Finland, 100% of the population do as of 2020.

be 2.6 times more likely to have internet access

In Burma, approximately 35.0% of the population has internet access as of 2020. In Finland, about 92.0% do as of 2020.

be 17.2% more likely to have access to improved drinking water

In Burma, approximately 85% of people have improved drinking water access (95% in urban areas, and 81% in rural areas) as of 2020. In Finland, that number is 100% of people on average (100% in urban areas, and 100% in rural areas) as of 2020.

Expenditures

spend 3.1 times more on education

Burma spends 2.0% of its total GDP on education as of 2019. Finland spends 6.3% of total GDP on education as of 2018.

spend 95.7% more on healthcare

Burma spends 4.7% of its total GDP on healthcare as of 2019. In Finland, that number is 9.2% of GDP as of 2019.

Geography

see 35.2% less coastline

Burma has a total of 1,930 km of coastline. In Finland, that number is 1,250 km.

The statistics above were calculated using the following data sources: The World Factbook.

Finland: At a glance

Finland is a sovereign country in Europe, with a total land area of approximately 303,815 sq km. Finland was a province and then a grand duchy under Sweden from the 12th to the 19th centuries, and an autonomous grand duchy of Russia after 1809. It gained complete independence in 1917. During World War II, it successfully defended its independence through cooperation with Germany and resisted subsequent invasions by the Soviet Union - albeit with some loss of territory. In the subsequent half century, Finland transformed from a farm/forest economy to a diversified modern industrial economy; per capita income is among the highest in Western Europe. A member of the European Union since 1995, Finland was the only Nordic state to join the euro single currency at its initiation in January 1999. In the 21st century, the key features of Finland's modern welfare state are high quality education, promotion of equality, and a national social welfare system - currently challenged by an aging population and the fluctuations of an export-driven economy.
Read more

How big is Finland compared to Burma? See an in-depth size comparison.

Share this

ASK THE ELSEWHERE COMMUNITY

Join the Elsewhere community and ask a question about Finland.or Burma It's a free, question-and-answer based forum to discuss what life is like in countries and cities around the world.